Rupert Pollard v. Fallco, Inc. and James Edward Fallman and Layana Collete Maxie
Rupert Pollard v. Fallco, Inc. and James Edward Fallman and Layana Collete Maxie
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-03-283-CV
RUPERT POLLARD APPELLANT
V.
FALLCO, INC. AND JAMES APPELLEES
EDWARD FALLMAN AND LAYANA
COLLETTE MAXIE
----------
FROM THE 67 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On July 30, 2004 we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6 (a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 31, 2004
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.