Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Lana Wilson Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

Lana Wilson Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 27, 2004

Lana Wilson Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-366-CV

LANA WILSON SCOGGIN            APPELLANT

V.

MIDFIRST BANK   APPELLEE

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

On April 1, 2004, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 27, 2004

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.