in the Matter of G. C.
in the Matter of G. C.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-04-00090-CV
In the Matter of G. C.
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. J-22,824, HONORABLE WILLIAM D. KING, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The district court found beyond a reasonable doubt that G.C. committed criminal trespass and adjudicated him delinquent. The court placed him on probation in the custody of his father and grandmother for six months.
G.C. was charged with two counts of burglary of a building and with criminal trespass. The trial judge held that the evidence was insufficient to convict G.C. for the burglaries, but adjudicated him delinquent for the Class B misdemeanor criminal trespass. By his sole issue on appeal, G.C. contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because he should have been tried under a more specific statute with a less severe punishment range. Compare Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 37.107 Code Ann. § 30.05
This Court has recently concluded in a similar juvenile case that these statutes are not in pari materia, that the State could charge the juvenile under either statute, and that the district court had jurisdiction over the allegation of criminal trespass against the juvenile. See In the Matter of J.M.R., No. 03-03-00749-CV, slip op. at 8, 2004 WL 2357887, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 21, 2004, no pet. h.). This appeal is controlled by that decision.
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
__________________________________________ Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton Affirmed Filed: November 12, 2004
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.