Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Rhett Webster Pease v. James R. Nickelatti and Brantley Ross Pringle, Jr.

Rhett Webster Pease v. James R. Nickelatti and Brantley Ross Pringle, Jr.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 29, 2004

Rhett Webster Pease v. James R. Nickelatti and Brantley Ross Pringle, Jr.

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00058-CV

Rhett Webster Pease, Appellant v. James R. Nickelatti and Brantley Ross Pringle, Jr., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 12527, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this cause was due on March 2, 2004. When notified that the clerk’s record was late, the district clerk informed this Court that appellant Rhett Webster Pease had not paid or made payment arrangements for the record and that appellant was not indigent. By letter of April 23, 2004, this Court informed appellant that he had ten days to make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b) (if appellant fails to pay or make payment arrangements for clerk’s record, court may dismiss appeal for want of prosecution). To date, appellant has neither made payment arrangements or responded to our notice in any other way.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Id.; Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) (dismissal for want of prosecution).

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: July 29, 2004

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.