Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Ricky Lane v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles

Ricky Lane v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 1, 2004

Ricky Lane v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00520-CV

Ricky Lane, Appellant v. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN300327, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Because appellant Ricky Lane has failed to file an appellant’s brief, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

The Clerk of this Court filed the clerk’s record in this cause on August 29, 2003.

Because the proceedings in the trial court were not transcribed, no reporter’s record was prepared or filed with this Court. Appellant’s brief was therefore due September 29, 2003. See id. 38.6(a)(1).

On November 10, the Clerk of this Court received and filed appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief. The Court granted this motion on November 13, 2003, extending the deadline for filing the brief to December 1, 2003, and the Clerk so advised the parties by postcard dated November 13. After appellant failed to meet the extended deadline, the Clerk notified the parties, by postcard dated January 16, 2004, that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless appellant tendered a motion by January 30 reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief.

See id. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has submitted neither a brief nor a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: April 1, 2004

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.