Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance v. Cox Newspapers, L.P. D/B/A Austin American-Statesman
Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance v. Cox Newspapers, L.P. D/B/A Austin American-Statesman
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-03-00635-CV
Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance, Appellants v. Cox Newspapers, L.P. d/b/a Austin American-Statesman, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 270452, HONORABLE ORLINDA L. NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Because appellants Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance have failed to arrange for the timely filing of a clerk=s record and have failed to submit a status report regarding their appeal, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
The Clerk of this Court filed appellants= notice of appeal on October 17, 2003. On December 3, 2003, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from the county clerk=s office of Travis County regarding the status of the clerk=s record. We received no response. By letter dated January 20, 2004, the Clerk of this Court requested from appellants a status report regarding this appeal by January 30 and informed the parties that a failure to timely respond to this request would result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellants have failed to respond to the request.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. See id. 42.3(b), (c).
__________________________________________ Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: February 20, 2004
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.