Schoenborn & Doll Enterprises, Inc., Intervener Into Judy Nolan v. American Club Systems, Inc.
Schoenborn & Doll Enterprises, Inc., Intervener Into Judy Nolan v. American Club Systems, Inc.
Opinion
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Appellant Schoenborn & Doll Enterprises, Inc., Intervener into Judy Nolan, perfected this appeal challenging the trial court's summary judgment in favor of appellee American Club Systems, Inc. Pending before this Court is Schoenborn's motion by which it represents it desires to have this appeal dismissed without prejudice. Without passing on the merits of the case, the motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Don H. Reavis
Justice
alse EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
NO. 07-09-0074-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
OCTOBER 25, 2010
______________________________
JAMES LYNN CAMPBELL,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
______________________________
FROM THE 47th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 57,233-A; HON. HAL MINER, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. The clerks and reporters record have been filed. Appellant has requested an attorney to represent him on appeal, stating he is indigent. Two attorneys, Maxwell Peck and Warren Clark, have been appointed by the trial court to represent appellant in this appeal. However, neither attorney is currently in private practice and therefore, cannot represent appellant.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 47th District Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine, by reasonable evidentiary procedure it selects, the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,
3. whether the appellant is entitled to the appointment of an attorney due to his indigency.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters (including the name, address, and phone number of any attorney it may appoint to represent appellant in this appeal) in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by November 24, 2010. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before November 24, 2010.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.