Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

in the Matter of the Marriage of Lorraine Sommerfeldt, M.D. and Milun Panovich and in the Interest of Malina Panovich and Tatiana Panovich, Children

in the Matter of the Marriage of Lorraine Sommerfeldt, M.D. and Milun Panovich and in the Interest of Malina Panovich and Tatiana Panovich, Children
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 19, 2004

in the Matter of the Marriage of Lorraine Sommerfeldt, M.D. and Milun Panovich and in the Interest of Malina Panovich and Tatiana Panovich, Children

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0318-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 19, 2004 ______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORRAINE SOMMERFELDT, M.D. AND MILUN PANOVICH AND IN THE INTEREST OF MALINA PANOVICH AND TATIANA PANOVICH, CHILDREN _________________________________ FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 52,401-C; HONORABLE PATRICK PIRTLE, JUDGE _______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Milun Panovich perfected this appeal from the trial court’s judgment of March 12, 2004. Pending before this Court is Panovich’s motion to dismiss the appeal by which he represents the parties have resolved all issues and he no longer desires to appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.1

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis Justice

Panovich requests relief under Rule 42.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure; however, he does not specify what subsection of 42.1(a)(2) he wishes the Court to follow. Thus, based on the substance of appellant’s motion, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, without a request from the parties our mandate will issue in due course.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.