Mineral Exchange, LTD. v. Texaco, Inc.
Mineral Exchange, LTD. v. Texaco, Inc.
Opinion
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
ORDER
Pending before this Court is the motion of appellants Mineral Exchange and Bourland & Leverich (2) by which they seek to vacate the March 9, 2004 setting for oral argument. The parties also request that the case be reset at a time agreed to by them and by this Court. We grant in part and deny in part.
It is ordered that the March 9, 2004, setting for oral submission is vacated. In all other respects, the motion is denied.
It is further ordered that: (1) all parties to this proceeding designate lead counsel in writing on or before May 1, 2004; see Tex. R. App. P. 6.1; (2) all parties only designate one counsel for each side to present oral argument; see Tex. R. App. P. 39.4; and (3) this Court's letter order of February 23, 2004, is withdrawn and the time allowed for oral argument at a date and time to be determined later will proceed pursuant to Rule 39.3, of which the parties will be notified by letter in accordance with Rule 39.9(c).
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
1. Counsel were advised of the March 9, 2004 setting and panel by letters of December 19, 2003, and February 13, 2004. Counsel are advised that the case may be submitted to a different panel when reset for oral argument in the future.
2. Bourland & Leverich are not parties in this cause number 07-03-0141-CV.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.