Arthur Goodson v. State
Arthur Goodson v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0479-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
FEBRUARY 5, 2004
______________________________
ARTHUR GOODSON, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 99-429492; HON. BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Arthur Goodson attempts to appeal a judgment revoking probation granted after his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. His notice of appeal was filed in the trial court November 7, 2003. A copy of the judgment attached to the notice of appeal and his docketing statement indicates sentence was imposed November 29, 2000.
Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996) . Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a) requires a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed, or within 90 days after imposition of the sentence if a timely motion for new trial is filed. In either event, appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely.
The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is by writ of habeas corpus from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004). Portley v. State , 89 S.W.3d 188, 190 (Tex.App.--Texarkana 2002, no pet.). Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, this court has no jurisdiction to take any action but to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); see Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522.
Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
James T. Campbell
Justice
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.