Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Renae Dolores Andrews v. Eddie Ray Andrews

Renae Dolores Andrews v. Eddie Ray Andrews
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 13, 2004

Renae Dolores Andrews v. Eddie Ray Andrews

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

RENAE DOLORES ANDREWS,                         )

                                                                              )               No.  08-03-00448-CV

Appellant,                          )

                                                                              )                    Appeal from the

v.                                                                           )

                                                                              )                 65th District Court

EDDIE RAY ANDREWS,                                    )

                                                                              )            of El Paso County, Texas

Appellee.                           )

                                                                              )               (TC# 2001CM5417)

                                                                              )

 

 

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

Pending before the Court is the Appellant=s motion to dismiss this appeal.  Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) states:

(a) On Motion or By Agreement.  The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

 

(1)        On Motion of Appellant.  In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

 

Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1).


Appellant has complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(1).  Appellant represents to the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of all issues on appeal.  The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant=s motion and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed.  We therefore dismiss the appeal.

 

 

May 13, 2004

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 3

Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and Chew, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.