Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

David Partida v. Socorro Banda Partida

David Partida v. Socorro Banda Partida
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 13, 2004

David Partida v. Socorro Banda Partida

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

DAVID PARTIDA,                                               )

                                                                              )               No.  08-04-00044-CV

Appellant,                          )

                                                                              )                    Appeal from the

v.                                                                           )

                                                                              )                383rd District Court

SOCORRO BANDA PARTIDA,                         )

                                                                              )            of El Paso County, Texas

Appellee.                           )

                                                                              )                 (TC# 98CM5635)

                                                                              )

 

 

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss this appeal.  Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A) states:

(a)        On Motion or By Agreement.  The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

 

                                                              .               .               .

 

(2)        By Agreement.  In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:

 

(A)       render judgment effectuating the parties= agreements . . . .

 

Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).


Appellant has complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A).  By joint motion, the parties represent to this Court that they have settled all issues raised by the lawsuit and subsequent appeal by agreement and no longer wish to prosecute the appeal.  We have considered this cause on this motion and conclude that the motion should be granted.  We therefore dismiss the appeal.

 

 

May 13, 2004

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 3

Barajas, C.J., Larsen, and Chew, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.