Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Stephen Cade, Individually and D/B/A Guardian Home Care Services, a Texas...

Stephen Cade, Individually and D/B/A Guardian Home Care Services, a Texas...
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 29, 2004

Stephen Cade, Individually and D/B/A Guardian Home Care Services, a Texas...

Opinion

Becker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS


STEPHEN CADE, INDIVIDUALLY AND

)

D/B/A GUARDIAN HOME CARE

)

SERVICES, A TEXAS PARTNERSHIP, AND

)

ROBERT FREEMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

)

D/B/A GUARDIAN HOME CARE

)

SERVICES, A TEXAS PARTNERSHIP,

)
No. 08-03-00266-CV

)

Appellants,

)
Appeal from

)

v.

)
106th District Court

)

JODI LEIGH NELSON AND

)
of Gaines County, Texas

EDDIE NELSON, INDIVIDUALLY,

)

AS SURVIVING PARENTS, AND ON

)
(TC# XX-XXXXXXX)

BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF

)

THOMAS JAMES NELSON, DECEASED,

)

)

Appellees.

)


MEMORANDUM OPINION



Pending before the Court is a joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and dismiss the underlying case with prejudice. The parties have filed this motion pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.1, which states that:

(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:



(1) On Motion of Appellant. In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.



(2) By Agreement. In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:



(A) render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements;



(B) set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements; or



(C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.



The parties have settled all matters in controversy. By their motion, the parties have agreed that the underlying judgment should be vacated and a judgment of dismissal with prejudice should be rendered. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(2)(A) and (B), we grant the joint motion, vacate the trial court's judgment and render a judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).



January 29, 2004 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice



Before Panel No. 2

Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.