Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Dorothy Cullen v. Mohamad Fatahi, M.D.

Dorothy Cullen v. Mohamad Fatahi, M.D.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 20, 2004

Dorothy Cullen v. Mohamad Fatahi, M.D.

Opinion

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 


No. 10-03-00302-CV

 

Dorothy Cullen,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

 

MohamAd Fatahi, M.D.,

                                                                      Appellee

 

 

 


From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court # 64690

 

MEMORANDUM  Opinion

 


      This appeal concerns a medical malpractice suit.  The trial court dismissed Cullen’s suit against Fatahi because Cullen failed to file an adequate expert report pursuant to former Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 4590i.  See Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas, 65th Leg., R.S., ch. 817, pt. 1, 1977 Tex. Gen. Laws 2039, repealed by Act of June 2, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 204, § 10.09, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 847, 884.  Cullen appeals.  We will affirm.

      An expert report must state the standard of care.  Act of May 5, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 140, § 1, sec. (r)(6), 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 985, 987 (repealed 2003) (current version at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(r)(6) (Vernon Supp. 2004)); see Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56, 61 (Tex. 2003); Am. Transitional Care Ctrs. of Tex., Inc. v. Palacios, 46 S.W.3d 873, 877 (Tex. 2001).  In the report filed by Cullen, the doctor stated that he was “aware of what the Standard of Care is” in the relevant practice, and stated that the care that Fatahi rendered “was below the Standard.”  But the report did not state what that standard is, and was thus inadequate.  See Walker at 65; Palacios at 879.  Accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing Cullen’s action.  See Act of May 5, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 140, § 1, sec. (e)(3), 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws at 986 (repealed 2003) (current version at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2004)); Walker at 61; Palacios at 877.  We overrule Cullen’s sole issue.

      We affirm the judgment.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Reyna

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed October 20, 2004

[CV06]

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.