Dorothy Cullen v. Mohamad Fatahi, M.D.
Dorothy Cullen v. Mohamad Fatahi, M.D.
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-03-00302-CV
Dorothy Cullen,
Appellant
v.
MohamAd Fatahi, M.D.,
Appellee
From the 40th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court # 64690
MEMORANDUM Opinion
This appeal concerns a medical malpractice suit. The trial court dismissed Cullen’s suit against Fatahi because Cullen failed to file an adequate expert report pursuant to former Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 4590i. See Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas, 65th Leg., R.S., ch. 817, pt. 1, 1977 Tex. Gen. Laws 2039, repealed by Act of June 2, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 204, § 10.09, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 847, 884. Cullen appeals. We will affirm.
An expert report must state the standard of care. Act of May 5, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 140, § 1, sec. (r)(6), 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 985, 987 (repealed 2003) (current version at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(r)(6) (Vernon Supp. 2004)); see Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56, 61 (Tex. 2003); Am. Transitional Care Ctrs. of Tex., Inc. v. Palacios, 46 S.W.3d 873, 877 (Tex. 2001). In the report filed by Cullen, the doctor stated that he was “aware of what the Standard of Care is” in the relevant practice, and stated that the care that Fatahi rendered “was below the Standard.” But the report did not state what that standard is, and was thus inadequate. See Walker at 65; Palacios at 879. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing Cullen’s action. See Act of May 5, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 140, § 1, sec. (e)(3), 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws at 986 (repealed 2003) (current version at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2004)); Walker at 61; Palacios at 877. We overrule Cullen’s sole issue.
We affirm the judgment.
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Vance, and
Justice Reyna
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed October 20, 2004
[CV06]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.