in Re: Park Highland Nursing Center in Its Assumed or Common Name
in Re: Park Highland Nursing Center in Its Assumed or Common Name
Opinion
NO. 12-04-00120-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: PARK HIGHLAND NURSING
CENTER IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON
NAME LIVING CENTERS OF TEXAS, INC.,
INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PARK HIGHLAND
NURSING CENTER; MARINER HEALTH
CARE, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
PARK HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER;
MARINER HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
PARK HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Relators have filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus, and all other counsel of record have been given notice of the filing of this motion. In their motion, Relators represent that the parties have reached an agreement that disposes of all issues presented in the underlying cause. Consequently, Relators no longer wish to pursue this original proceeding. Because Relators have met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), the motion is granted, and this original proceeding is dismissed. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the party incurring them.
Opinion delivered October 22, 2004.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
OCTOBER 22, 2004
NO. 12-04-00120-CV
IN RE: PARK HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON
NAME LIVING CENTERS OF TEXAS, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PARK
HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER; MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.,
INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PARK HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER;
MARINER HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PARK HIGHLAND NURSING CENTER
Original Proceeding from the Third Judicial District Court
of Henderson County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 03-134)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on Relator’s motion to voluntarily dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus, and the Court having heard and fully considered said motion is of the opinion the same should be Granted.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, Hereby Dismissed and that all costs of this petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same are, adjudged against the parties incurring same, and that this decision be certified to the trial court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.