Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Gregory S. King

Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Gregory S. King
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 8, 2004

Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Gregory S. King

Opinion

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-04-00117-CV

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS


INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE , 

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,                         §     APPEAL FROM THE 4TH

APPELLANT

 

V.                                                                         §     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF


GREGORY S. KING,

APPELLEE                                                        §     RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS


                                                                                                                                                            

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

           This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

            Appellant filed its brief on August 17, 2004. On that same date, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that its brief failed to comply with Rule 38.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant was also notified that the brief would be returned and deemed past due unless on or before August 24, 2004, Appellant forwarded an original plus four copies of a supplement to its brief correcting the defect. Finally, Appellant was warned that failure to file the requested supplement would result in the appeal being presented to the Court for dismissal for failure to timely file the brief. Appellant's deadline for complying with the August 17 notice has now passed, and Appellant has neither complied with the notice or otherwise responded.

            On September 2, 2004, we returned Appellant's brief. Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for Appellant's failure to comply with Rule 38.1(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 8, 2004.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.


(PUBLISH)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.