Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Claude I. Upshaw and Joi Ham v. Myrtle Elaine Gonerway

Claude I. Upshaw and Joi Ham v. Myrtle Elaine Gonerway
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 18, 2004

Claude I. Upshaw and Joi Ham v. Myrtle Elaine Gonerway

Opinion

DISMISSAL FORM FOR CIVIL CASES ON ANT'S MOTION /SETTLEMENT

                     NO. 12-04-00252-CV

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS



CLAUDE I. UPSHAW AND JOI HAM,           §     APPEAL FROM THE 145TH

APPELLANTS


V.                                                                         §     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF


MYRTLE ELAINE GONERWAY,

APPELLEE                                                        §     NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS






MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, alleging that the order from which Appellees attempt to appeal is interlocutory and therefore not appealable. Appellants have filed a response in which they agree with Appellee and join in Appellee’s request for dismissal. Because the parties have met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered August 18, 2004.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.



(PUBLISH)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.