Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Wenona Parrish Corbett v. Cattlemen's Livestock Market, Inc.

Wenona Parrish Corbett v. Cattlemen's Livestock Market, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 30, 2004

Wenona Parrish Corbett v. Cattlemen's Livestock Market, Inc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM HEADING

NO. 12-04-00009-CV



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT



TYLER, TEXAS





WENONA PARRISH CORBETT,

§
APPEAL FROM THE

APPELLANT



V.

§
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF



CATTLEMEN'S LIVESTOCK MARKET, INC.,

APPELLEE

§
UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS





MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Wenona Parrish Corbett ("Corbett") filed a notice of appeal on January 14, 2004. The notice of appeal does not state the date of the judgment or order appealed from as required by rule 25.1(d)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Corbett also filed a copy of a motion for new trial filed in the District Court of Upshur County on January 12, 2004. Attached to the motion for new trial is a copy of a default judgment against Corbett signed on February 21, 2003 in the Circuit Court of Pike County, Arkansas. By her motion for new trial, Corbett seeks to prevent the enforcement of the Arkansas judgment.

On January 15, 2004, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1, this court notified Corbett that the information received in this appeal does not include an appealable order and therefore does not show the jurisdiction of this court. Corbett was further notified that unless she amended the information in this appeal on or before January 26, 2004, the appeal would be dismissed. On January 20, 2004, Corbett responded to our notice by informing the court that the appeal is "from the filing of a Foreign Judgment" and submitting a copy of a Notice of Filing Foreign Judgment prepared by the District Clerk of Upshur County, Texas and addressed to Corbett.



This court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to appeals from final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature has deemed appealable. City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849 S.W.2d 810, 811 (Tex. 1993); see, e.g., Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2003). The mere filing of a foreign judgment is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.



Opinion delivered January 30, 2004.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

















































(PUBLISH)











COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT



JANUARY 30, 2004



NO. 12-04-00009-CV



WENONA PARRISH CORBETT,

Appellant

V.

CATTLEMEN'S LIVESTOCK MARKET, INC.,

Appellee





Appeal from the Judicial District Court

of Upshur County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 837-03)





THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court that this Court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby Dismissed For Want of Jurisdiction; that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the appellant, Wenona Parrish Corbett, and for which execution shall issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.







THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF UPSHUR COUNTY, GREETINGS:



Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 30th day of January, 2004, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between



WENONA PARRISH CORBETT, Appellant



NO. 12-04-00009-CV and Tr. Ct. Case Number 837-03



Opinion



CATTLEMEN'S LIVESTOCK MARKET, INC., Appellee



was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of the Court that this Court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.



It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby Dismissed For Want of Jurisdiction; that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the appellant, Wenona Parrish Corbett, and for which execution shall issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.



WHEREAS, YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to observe the foregoing order of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.



WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the ______ day of __________________, 200_.



CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK





By:_______________________________

Deputy Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.