Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Todd Dyer v. Boy Scouts of America, Theron Jones, Paul Carter, and Ken Melhorn, the Gulf Coast Counsel, Boy Scouts of America

Todd Dyer v. Boy Scouts of America, Theron Jones, Paul Carter, and Ken Melhorn, the Gulf Coast Counsel, Boy Scouts of America
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 30, 2004

Todd Dyer v. Boy Scouts of America, Theron Jones, Paul Carter, and Ken Melhorn, the Gulf Coast Counsel, Boy Scouts of America

Opinion






NUMBER 13-04-417-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


TODD DYER,                                                                    Appellant,


v.


BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, ET AL.,                                  Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, TODD DYER, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-02-5667CV-A-1. The order in this cause was signed on July 1, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on August 2, 2004, but was not filed until August 6, 2004.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30th day of September, 2004.






Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.