Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Dulce Maria Juarez Hutsell v. Michael Bryan Hutsell

Dulce Maria Juarez Hutsell v. Michael Bryan Hutsell
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 26, 2004

Dulce Maria Juarez Hutsell v. Michael Bryan Hutsell

Opinion







NUMBER 13-04-265-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________


DULCE MARIA JUAREZ HUTSELL,                                      Appellant,


v.


MICHAEL BRYAN HUTSELL,                                                Appellee.

____________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, DULCE MARIA JUAREZ HUTSELL, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2003-10-5203-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.          If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

         On July 22, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to cure the defect.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to cure the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 26th day of August, 2004.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.