in Re Phillip D. Cunningham, Jr., Richard Stacey and Stacun, Inc. D/B/A Stacun Investigations
in Re Phillip D. Cunningham, Jr., Richard Stacey and Stacun, Inc. D/B/A Stacun Investigations
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-389-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE PHILLIP D. CUNNINGHAM, JR., RICHARD STACY
AND STACUN, INC. D/B/A STACUN INVESTIGATIONS
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relators, Phillip D. Cunningham, Jr., Richard Stacey & Stacun, Inc. d/b/a Stacun Investigations, filed a motion for temporary relief and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 28, 2004. On July 29, 2004, the Court granted the motion for temporary relief and requested a response from the real party in interest, Steve Chapman.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the stay of the trial court’s order of June 30, 2004, requiring disclosure of the relators’ client(s) is hereby ordered LIFTED. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 17th day of August, 2004.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.