Orlando Ortiz v. State
Orlando Ortiz v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-160-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
ORLANDO ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
__________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Castillo
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, ORLANDO ORTIZ, attempts to appeal a conviction for assault on a public servant. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On March 25, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.
On March 29, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 20th day of May, 2004.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.