NUMBER 13-01-637-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

STEVEN RICHARD HORNER,                                Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

CONCURRING OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo

Concurring Opinion by Justice Castillo

         I concur with the result of the majority opinion. The majority withdrew our original opinion particularly to address the merits of an issue asserted in a brief Horner filed pro se to supplement the brief his court appointed appellate counsel filed on his behalf. Respectfully, I would hold that Horner has presented nothing for appellate review in his fourth issue presented.

         Horner requested and was granted court appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. His counsel filed a brief in the case. Horner has not clearly and unequivocally asserted his right to represent himself on appeal. Thus, court appointed counsel remains the attorney of record in this appeal. There is no right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, I would hold that Horner is not entitled to hybrid representation on appeal. The pro se brief presents nothing for review. Id. Without reaching or addressing the merits of Horner’s supplemental issue, on this record I would also vacate as improvidently granted any order allowing him hybrid representation.

                                                                        ERRLINDA CASTILLO

                                                                        Justice

Publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Concurring opinion delivered and

filed this 3rd day of March, 2004.