Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Tony Shane Peters v. State

Tony Shane Peters v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 26, 2004

Tony Shane Peters v. State

Opinion






NUMBER 13-03-725-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


TONY SHANE PETERS,                                                     Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS TDCJ-ID, ET AL.,                            Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 24th District Court

of De Witt County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, TONY SHANE PETERS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of De Witt County, Texas, in cause number 02-09-129,123. Judgment in this cause was signed on September 30, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on October 30, 2003, but was not filed until December 4, 2003.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has filed an untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal and a motion requesting that the appeal not be dismissed.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s motions, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s untimely motion for leave to file notice of appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion requesting that the appeal not be dismissed is dismissed as moot. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of February, 2004.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.