Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Frank and Cynthia Aldridge v. Letha and Robert Blain

Frank and Cynthia Aldridge v. Letha and Robert Blain
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 22, 2004

Frank and Cynthia Aldridge v. Letha and Robert Blain

Opinion







NUMBER 13-03-463-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________


FRANK AND CYNTHIA ALDRIDGE,                                    Appellants,


v.


LETHA AND ROBERT BLAIN,                                             Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 24th District Court

of De Witt County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, FRANK AND CYNTHIA ALDRIDGE, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of De Witt County, Texas, in cause number 98-12-17,896. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

         If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

         On October 21, 2003, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.          The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants’ failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, appellants’ failure to respond, and appellees’ motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM


Opinion delivered and filed

this 22nd day of January, 2004.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.