in Re: John Worldpeace
in Re: John Worldpeace
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00170-CV
____________
IN RE JOHN WORLDPEACE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator John Worldpeace filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator asserts the Honorable James R. Fry, who was assigned by the Texas Supreme Court to preside over a disciplinary proceeding against relator, abused his discretion by making relator=s disbarment effective before the expiration of the trial court=s plenary power over the judgment.[1]
Relator has not established he is entitled to extraordinary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3, 52.7; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2004.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Guzman.
[1] The underlying action is styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. John Worldpeace, filed under cause number 2002-42081, in the 269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Relator=s appeal of his disbarment judgment is currently pending under this court=s appeal number 14-03-01339-CV.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.