Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2004

Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.)

Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.)
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 20, 2004

Nitla, S.A. De C v. v. Nationsbank of Texas, N.A. N/K/A Bank of America, N.A., (Also F/K/A Nationsbank, N.A.)

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2004

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2004.

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-04-00070-CV

NO. 14-04-00303-CV

____________

 

NITLA, S.A. de C.V., Appellant

 

V.

 

NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. n/k/a BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

(also f/k/a NATIONSBANK, N.A.), Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 96-44152

 

 

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

The trial court signed a final judgment in cause number 96-44152 on October 22, 2003.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment, which is docketed under our appeal number 14-04-00070-CV.  On February 28, 2004, this court ordered the parties to mediation. 


On March 19, 2004, the trial court signed a turnover order and appointed a receiver for appellant=s assets.  Appellant filed notices of appeal from this order, and the second appeal is docketed under our appeal number 14-04-00303-CV.  On March 29, 2004, appellant filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals.  The motion was granted. 

On April 6, 2004, this court denied an emergency motion for temporary relief requesting that we stay enforcement of the judgment.  Appellant=s motion to review the amount of the supersedeas deposit remained pending before the court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4.

On May 17, 2004, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeals because the case has been settled in mediation.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  The parties also request that all motions or other pending matters related to these appeals be denied.  The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeals are ordered dismissed.  Appellant=s motion to review the supersedeas deposit is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

 

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2004.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Guzman.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.