Johnson v. Dallas Housing Authority
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Taneisha Pauliono v. Riverside Village Apartments (Tex. App. 2022)
- Castine McIlhargey and Jody McIntyre, Individually, and Derivatively on Behalf of A+ Pro Recovery and Towing, LLC v. Erik M. Hager, Jason Rios, Eduardo Pena, Joanna Pena, and South Padre Towing and Recovery, LLC (Tex. App. 2022)
- in the Interest of T.D.G., a Child (Tex. App. 2022)
- B&V Landscaping v. Roscoe Robert Harvey, Nancy Joyce Harvey and Harvey R&N Trust (Tex. App. 2022)
- Robert Layton, Doing Business as Layton Welding v. Lavaca County (Tex. App. 2021)
- Isaias Irisson Jr. v. Lone Star National Bank (Tex. App. 2020)
- in the Interest of A.A.A. and J.L.A. Jr., Children (Tex. App. 2020)
- Carlton E. Corbin v. Howard M. Reiner (Tex. App. 2019)
- Gary Obleton v. Cynthia Guzman (Tex. App. 2016)
- Alan Molnoskey v. XOG Operating, LLC (Tex. App. 2015)
- in Re: A Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. (Tex. App. 2015)
- in Re: A Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. (Tex. App. 2015)
- in Re: A Purported Lien or Claim Against Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. (Tex. App. 2015)
- Habib Surani v. Trinity River Vision Authority (Tex. App. 2013)
- Habib Surani v. Trinity River Vision Authority (Tex. App. 2013)
- John Paul Clements v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. (Tex. App. 2012)
- Charles H. Myers v. Samuel Myers (Tex. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
A review of this appeal shows that appellant filed her brief on July 14, 2005. By letter dated July 22, 2005, this Court notified appellant that her brief was deficient in that it did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1, subsections (a)-(j). The letter instructed appellant to file an original and seven copies of an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within ten days.
By letter dated September 1, 2005, we notified appellant that we had not received the amended brief. The Court instructed appellant to file an amended brief by September 12, 2005 and warned that her failure to do so could result in dismissal of the appeal.
As of this date, appellant has not filed an amended brief nor has she provided the Court with any explanation for her failure to do so. Therefore, on the Court’s own motion, we STRIKE as deficient appellant’s July 14, 2005 brief. As there is no appellant’s brief in this appeal, we DISMISS the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8, 38.9 & 42.3.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.