Brenda Lee Villa v. State
Brenda Lee Villa v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-137-CR
BRENDA LEE VILLA APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
Brenda Lee Villa appeals her sentence for robbery by threats. In a single point, appellant complains that the trial court improperly denied her motion for new trial because her sentence is excessive. We affirm.
Appellant did not object to her sentence when it was imposed. Although her motion for new trial complains that the sentence is excessive and disproportionate to her conduct, she did not present the motion to the trial court. Accordingly, appellant has forfeited her complaint on appeal.[2] We overrule appellant=s point and affirm the trial court=s judgment.
PER CURIAM
PANEL F: CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 15, 2005
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a); Carranza v. State, 960 S.W.2d 76, 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Amaro v. State, 970 S.W.2d 172, 174 n.2 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1998, no pet.).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.