Barbara Crampton v. Normandy Apartments
Barbara Crampton v. Normandy Apartments
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-05-058-CV
BARBARA CRAMPTON APPELLANT
V.
NORMANDY APARTMENTS APPELLEE
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WICHITA COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On May 26, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: June 30, 2005
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.