Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Holly Golightly Wood v. Robert Wesely Wood, III

Holly Golightly Wood v. Robert Wesely Wood, III
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 23, 2005

Holly Golightly Wood v. Robert Wesely Wood, III

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-04-340-CV

 
  

HOLLY GOLIGHTLY WOOD                                                     APPELLANT

 

V.

 

ROBERT WESLEY WOOD, III                                                      APPELLEE

 
 

----------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

        On May 26, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

        Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

  

                                                                  PER CURIAM

 
 
 

PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT and HOLMAN, JJ.

 

DELIVERED: June 23, 2005


NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.