Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

McClairy Jackson v. Frank Hoke, R. Wathen, Grievance Investigator 212, D. Ford, and v. Barrow

McClairy Jackson v. Frank Hoke, R. Wathen, Grievance Investigator 212, D. Ford, and v. Barrow
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 2, 2005

McClairy Jackson v. Frank Hoke, R. Wathen, Grievance Investigator 212, D. Ford, and v. Barrow

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-05-099-CV

MCCLAIRY JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

FRANK HOKE, R. WATHEN, GRIEVANCE APPELLEE

INVESTIGATOR #212, D. FORD, AND V. BARROW

------------

FROM THE 89 TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

------------

On April 19, 2005 and May 6, 2005, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.   See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998, (footnote: 2) we dismiss the appeal.   See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2, 2005

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:

July 21, 1998 “Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals,” 971-972 S.W.2d (Tex. Cases) XXXVIII (1998).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.