Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Robert L. Harr v. Richard Charles Allen

Robert L. Harr v. Richard Charles Allen
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 19, 2005

Robert L. Harr v. Richard Charles Allen

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-009-CV

ROBERT L. HARR APPELLANT

V.

RICHARD CHARLES ALLEN   APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

On April 11, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).   See Tex. R. App. P . 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension.   See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 19, 2005

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.