Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Leo Wentz and Brac Wardlaw v. Brent Ipock and Maria Ipock

Leo Wentz and Brac Wardlaw v. Brent Ipock and Maria Ipock
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 7, 2005

Leo Wentz and Brac Wardlaw v. Brent Ipock and Maria Ipock

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-05-051-CV

 
 

LEO WENTZ AND                                                                APPELLANTS

BRAC WARDLAW

 

V.

 

BRENT IPOCK AND MARIA IPOCK                                            APPELLEES

 
 

------------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

        We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

        Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

     
 

                                                                  PER CURIAM 

 
 

PANEL D:   DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN and GARDNER, JJ.

  

DELIVERED: April 7, 2005


 

NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.