Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Steven Wayne Fletcher v. State

Steven Wayne Fletcher v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 10, 2005

Steven Wayne Fletcher v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-04-320-CR

 
 

STEVEN WAYNE FLETCHER                                                    APPELLANT

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                  STATE

 
 

------------

 

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 3 OF DENTON COUNTY

 

------------

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

 

------------

        Appellant Steven Wayne Fletcher appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. In a single issue, Appellant claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress.

        Officer Douglas Norman of the Roanoke Police Department observed Appellant turn without signaling from a private parking lot onto Holley Parkway, which is a public road, and from Holley Parkway onto Highway 114, which is a public road. Officer Norman initiated a traffic stop based on Appellant’s failure to signal when he turned from Holley Parkway onto Highway 114. Appellant claims that this stop was unauthorized because he was not required to signal when he turned onto Holley Parkway or onto Highway 114. The provisions of the transportation code, however, required Appellant to use his turn signal to indicate an intention to turn from Holley Parkway onto Highway 114. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.104(a) (Vernon 1999).2  Because Officer Norman observed Appellant commit a traffic violation, his traffic stop of Appellant’s vehicle was authorized. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 14.01(b) (Vernon 1977); Garcia v. State, 827 S.W.2d 937, 944 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Moreno v. State, 124 S.W.3d 339, 346 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); see also Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 817, 116 S. Ct. 1769, 1776 (1996) (holding that when officer observes traffic violation, objective circumstances exist justifying stop of car). We overrule Appellant’s issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

   
  

                                                          SUE WALKER

                                                          JUSTICE

 
 

PANEL B:   LIVINGSTON, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED: March 10, 2005


NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2.  Officer Norman observed Appellant fail to use a turn signal to indicate his intention to turn from a public street onto a public highway, so State v. Ballman, No. 2-03-345-CR, 2004 WL 2914999 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.) is not controlling.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.