Kelly Black v. Statewide Trucking Corp., and Its Unknown Agents or Employees And Jorge Ramirez
Kelly Black v. Statewide Trucking Corp., and Its Unknown Agents or Employees And Jorge Ramirez
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-04-221-CV
KELLY BLACK APPELLANT
V.
STATEWIDE TRUCKING CORP., APPELLEES
AND ITS UNKNOWN AGENTS OR
EMPLOYEES; AND JORGE RAMIREZ
----------
FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
On December 9, 2004, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P . 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 13, 2005
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.