Robert W. Paige, M.D. v. Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C. F/K/A Sprouse, Mozola, Smith & Rowley, P.C. and John Mozola
Robert W. Paige, M.D. v. Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C. F/K/A Sprouse, Mozola, Smith & Rowley, P.C. and John Mozola
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0319-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL E
APRIL 14, 2005
______________________________
ROBERT W. PAIGE, M.D.,
Appellant
v.
SPROUSE, SMITH & ROWLEY, P.C. F/K/A
SPROUSE, MOZOLA, SMITH & ROWLEY, P.C.
AND JOHN MOZOLA,
Appellees
_________________________________
FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 88,858-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. (footnote: 1)
Kent Ries, trustee for the bankruptcy estate of appellant Robert W. Paige, M.D., and Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C., f/k/a Sprouse, Mozola, Smith & Rowley, P.C., and John Mozola, appellees, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice because the parties have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute and neither desire to pursue the appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn
Justice
FOOTNOTES
1:
John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.