Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Ex Parte Thomas Warner

Ex Parte Thomas Warner
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 7, 2005

Ex Parte Thomas Warner

Opinion

NO. 07-05-0121-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 7, 2005

______________________________

Ex parte THOMAS WARNER,

Appellant

_________________________________

FROM THE 154 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY;

NO. 16,507; HON. FELIX KLEIN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Order of Dismissal

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Thomas Warner appeals from an order dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus.  The writ was sought to obtain release from the purported restraint of Bruce Peel, mayor of Littlefield, Texas.  Peel had moved for dismissal, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the proceedings.  The trial court granted the motion.  We now dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

One may not appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus unless the order arose after a hearing on the merits and the trial court denied the application on the merits.   Ex parte Hargett , 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Next, granting a motion to dismiss due to the absence of jurisdiction is not a ruling on the merits.   See Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue , 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 2000); see also City of Lubbock v. Rule, 68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.– Amarillo 2002, no pet.).  So because the trial court dismissed the appeal due to the lack of jurisdiction, we ourselves have no jurisdiction over the appeal.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Brian Quinn

     Justice

Do not publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.