Ex Parte Shane A. Hill
Ex Parte Shane A. Hill
Opinion
NO. 07-05-0119-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
APRIL 7, 2005
______________________________
Ex parte SHANE A. HILL,
Appellant
_________________________________
FROM THE 154 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY;
NO. 16,538; HON. FELIX KLEIN, PRESIDING
_______________________________
Order of Dismissal
_______________________________
Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Shane A. Hill appeals from an order dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus. The writ was sought to obtain release from the purported restraint of Bruce Peel, mayor of Littlefield, Texas. Peel had moved for dismissal, contending that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the proceedings. The trial court granted the motion. We now dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
One may not appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus unless the order arose after a hearing on the merits and the trial court denied the application on the merits. Ex parte Hargett , 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Next, granting a motion to dismiss due to the absence of jurisdiction is not a ruling on the merits. See Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue , 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 2000); see also City of Lubbock v. Rule, 68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. App.– Amarillo 2002, no pet.). So because the trial court dismissed the appeal due to the lack of jurisdiction, we ourselves have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Brian Quinn
Justice
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.