Gary Dale Parr v. State
Gary Dale Parr v. State
Opinion
Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. (1)
Pending before this Court is appellant Gary Dale Parr's request to withdraw his notice of appeal by which he represents he no longer wishes to pursue this matter. The motion is personally signed by appellant as required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. (2)
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Don H. Reavis
Justice
Do not publish.
1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.
2. Appellant asserts he is entitled to more time credit than indicated in the judgment; however, he indicates he will pursue the matter through the administrative process provided by law for such corrections.
Motion to Dismiss in which, Lee Y. Cockrell, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Alice B. Ingrum Gray, an Incapacitated Person, represents that pursuant to a settlement agreement, he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. Cockrell also represents that all disputes between the parties have been settled and requests dismissal with prejudice.
Without passing on the merits of the case, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. Having dismissed the appeal at Cockrell's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Patrick A. Pirtle
Justice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.