John J. Hindera v. Nelson Dometrius
John J. Hindera v. Nelson Dometrius
Opinion
Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. (1)
Pending before this Court is the second motion to dismiss of appellee Nelson Dometrius by which he requests dismissal citing appellant John J. Hindera's lack of due diligence in pursuing this appeal. By order dated January 20, 2005, we reinstated the appeal and notified Hindera that failure to take any action within 10 days would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. Hindera did not respond. We grant Dometrius's motion and dismiss the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Don H. Reavis
Justice
1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.
ata/>
NO. 07-10-0173-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
DECEMBER 14, 2010
ASHLEY A. GROOM, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. TWO OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2007-448335; HONORABLE DRUE FARMER, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL, HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Appellant, Ashley A. Groom, filed Notice of Appeal to appeal a judgment of conviction for the offense of reckless driving and sentence of 30 days incarceration in the Lubbock County Jail entered against her in cause number 2007-448335 in County Court at Law, No. Two, of Lubbock County, Texas. However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss her appeal.
Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and this Court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the motion is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue.
Mackey K. Hancock
Justice
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.