Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Sandra and Joseph Vibbert v. Wells Fargo Texas, N.A., D/B/A Wells Fargo Bank, and Par, Inc.

Sandra and Joseph Vibbert v. Wells Fargo Texas, N.A., D/B/A Wells Fargo Bank, and Par, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 13, 2005

Sandra and Joseph Vibbert v. Wells Fargo Texas, N.A., D/B/A Wells Fargo Bank, and Par, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

SANDRA and JOSEPH VIBBERT,                      )

                                                                              )               No.  08-05-00167-CV

Appellants,                         )

                                                                              )                    Appeal from the

v.                                                                           )

                                                                              )             County Court at Law #7

WELLS FARGO TEXAS, N.A. d/b/a WELLS     )

FARGO BANK and PAR, INC.,                          )            of El Paso County, Texas

                                                                              )

Appellees.                          )                  (TC# 2003-1929)

                                                                              )

 

 

O P I N I O N

 

Pending before the Court is the parties agreed motion to dismiss the appeal against Appellee Wells Fargo Texas, N.A. d/b/a Wells Fargo Bank (AWells Fargo@) only and to dismiss Appellee Wells Fargo only from the appeal.  See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2).

The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2).  The parties represent to the Court that they have agreed to dismiss Appellee Wells Fargo only, which encompasses the issues presented against Wells Fargo in this appeal.  The parties did not agree that they have settled their claims against Appellee Par Inc. and thus their claims against Appellee Par Inc. remain pending in this appeal.  The parties request that the claims against Appellee Wells Fargo only be dismissed from the appeal and that Appellee Wells Fargo only be dismissed from the appeal.


We have considered this cause on the motion and conclude that the motion should be granted.  Therefore, we dismiss the Appellants= claims against Appellee Wells Fargo ONLY and Appellee Wells Fargo ONLY is dismissed from the appeal.  The other parties and claims remain pending in this appeal.

 

October 13, 2005

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice

 

Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.