R.L. Randolph and Patricia Randolph v. Pilgrims Pride, Inc.
R.L. Randolph and Patricia Randolph v. Pilgrims Pride, Inc.
Opinion
On June 23, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellants explained why they needed time for filing the record. Appellants did not respond. The appellants are not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellants.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
__________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered August 25, 2005
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.