Anthony Boring v. City of Dayton
Anthony Boring v. City of Dayton
Opinion
On April 7, 2005, we abated the appeal for sixty days and warned the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless a final judgment was signed by the trial court. As of today, we have not been notified of the entry of judgment. The order of abatement is therefore withdrawn. Neither a judgment nor an appealable order has been signed. Subject to certain statutory exceptions not applicable in this case, only final judgments are appealable. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, 51.014 (Vernon 1997 & Supp. 2005). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered June 30, 2005
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ. 1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.