Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

George Roy Brown, Sr. v. Fatts Trucking & Auto Sales and Service, Frank Patillo's Trucking, Brystar Contracting, Inc. and City of Beaumont, Texas

George Roy Brown, Sr. v. Fatts Trucking & Auto Sales and Service, Frank Patillo's Trucking, Brystar Contracting, Inc. and City of Beaumont, Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 2, 2005

George Roy Brown, Sr. v. Fatts Trucking & Auto Sales and Service, Frank Patillo's Trucking, Brystar Contracting, Inc. and City of Beaumont, Texas

Opinion

In The


Court of Appeals


Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________


NO. 09-05-157 CV

____________________



GEORGE ROY BROWN JR., Appellant



V.



FATTS TRUCKING & AUTO SALES AND SERVICE, FRANK PATILLO'S
TRUCKING, BRYSTAR CONTRACTING, INC., AND

THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, TX, Appellees



On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-165,375



MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

On April 8, 2005, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a judgment or other appealable order, and that it appeared no judgment or appealable order has been signed in the case. The appellant filed a response but he does not contend that a judgment or other appealable order has been signed. Subject to certain statutory exceptions not applicable in this case, only final judgments are appealable. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, 51.014 (Vernon 1997 & Supp. 2005). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered June 2, 2005

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑