On motion for rehearing, the relator suggests our Opinion can be viewed as requiring disclosure of the names and activities of customers not involved in this litigation, the disclosure of which would not aid in the resolution of this dispute. In modifying its order, we are confident the trial court will follow the Opinion of this Court and require sufficient pleadings and narrowly tailored discovery requests. See also In re Sears, Roebuck and Co., 146 S.W.3d 328, 332-34 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2004, orig. proceeding).

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered May 19, 2005

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.