Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Johnny Gordon Teeters v. State

Johnny Gordon Teeters v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 19, 2005

Johnny Gordon Teeters v. State

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-04-519 CR

NO. 09-04-520 CR

NO. 09-04-521 CR

____________________



JOHNNY GORDON TEETERS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 81182, 81184 and 81185




MEMORANDUM TO CLERK


You are directed to make the following corrections in the Memorandum Opinion dated January 19, 2005:

On Page 1, in the style of the case, change "Trial Cause Nos. 81882, 81884 and 81885" to "Trial Cause Nos. 81182, 81184 and 81185".

You will give notice of these corrections in the original Memorandum Opinion by sending a copy of the corrected page accompanied by this memorandum to all interested parties who received a copy of the original Memorandum Opinion.

Entered this the 26th day of January, 2005.

PER CURIAM















In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-04-519 CR

NO. 09-04-520 CR

NO. 09-04-521 CR

____________________



JOHNNY GORDON TEETERS, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 81182, 81184 and 81185




MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

Johnny Gordon Teeters was convicted and sentenced on three separate indictments for the offense of indecency with a child. Teeters filed notices of appeal on December 3, 2004. In each case, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court's certifications have been provided to the Court of Appeals by the district clerk.

On December 8, 2004, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless amended certifications were filed within thirty days of the date of the notices and made a part of the appellate records. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1. The records have not been supplemented with amended certifications. Because a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record, the appeals must be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM



Opinion Delivered January 19, 2005

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.