Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

in Re: Dave Todd, Iii

in Re: Dave Todd, Iii
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 22, 2005

in Re: Dave Todd, Iii

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                             

                                  CAUSE NUMBER 13-05-00656-CR

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

                                           IN RE: DAVE TODD, III

____________________________________________________________

 

                                  On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

 ____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                     Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez

                                Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]

 

Relator, Dave Todd, III, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 24, 2005.  The Court requested that the real party in interest, the State of Texas by and through the District Attorney in and for Nueces County, Texas, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 14, 2005.  The response was filed on November 10, 2005.


The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and response, is of the opinion that this original proceeding should be DENIED as moot. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 22nd day of November, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.