Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2005

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 7, 2005

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran

Opinion







NUMBER 13-04-266-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III,                                                   Appellant,


v.


CLAUDIA YVONNE MORAN,                                               Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-02-1112-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

         If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

         On February 24, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                                                          PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 7th day of April, 2005.



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.