Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2006

City of Reno v. Arvel Corporation and B. Storm Phillips

City of Reno v. Arvel Corporation and B. Storm Phillips
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 5, 2006

City of Reno v. Arvel Corporation and B. Storm Phillips

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-437-CV

CITY OF RENO APPELLANT

V.

ARVEL CORPORATION AND B. STORM PHILLIPS APPELLEES

----------

FROM THE 415 TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See T EX. R. A PP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellant , for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL B: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 5, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.